Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > rm_GGal > The Gspot Journal |
G-Gal's take on the Great G-Spot Debate
|
G-Gal's take on the Great G-Spot Debate Given the title of my blog, I've been wanting to post about this for AGES, but... all my juicy sex stories have taken precedence. I'm sure the average joe doesn't mind... I mean who the heck comes to a sex blog to read boring stuff like the g-spot debate? I mean, that's too dang thinking to do for a sex blog. Well, unfortunately for you guys who come here not intending to use your grey matter and hoping for a post with a picture of my titties... this is not the post for that. Although I do plan to post a pic of my titties eventually. And I'll make sure they're both nice and perky for you. But not today! For those living under a coconut shell and have no idea WHAT a g-spot is (I presume you're still a virgin.... but that's ok!), here is Wikipedia's definition of a g-spot: The Gräfenberg Spot, often called the G-Spot, is the bean-shaped area of the vagina that many women report to contain an erogenous zone which when stimulated can lead to high levels of sexual arousal, powerful orgasms, and female ejaculation. The Gräfenberg Spot is typically located one to three inches up the front (anterior) vaginal wall between the vagina opening and the urethra and is a sensitive area that is part of the female prostate. Since time memorial, people have questioned the existence of the g-spot. Some say it's a figment of the female imagination, others (usually females) say it does exist. And being a bit of science geek myself (science geeks can be horny too, ok?), I decided to do a bit of investigation on the findings and opinions of the scientific community on this topic. And here's what I found: A) The British science geeks who said it does not existA little search on Google on this topic showed that most articles on this topic refer to a scientific study conducted by some Brits that was published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine around early January 2010, which very boldly stated that the female g-spot does NOT appear to exist. This was based on surveys on 1,800 British females, all of which were identical or fraternal twins. If the g-spot did exist, it would be expected that both identical twins, who have the same genes, would report having one. But this pattern did not emerge and the identical twins were no more likely to share a G-spot than non-identical twins who share only half of their genes. And based on this, the science geeks concluded that the idea of a g-spot is purely subjective, a 'figment of the female imagination' and most likely does not exist.  The Italian science geek who said it does exist, but only in some womenBut then 2 years earlier, an Italian researcher published an article also in the Journal of Sexual Medicine, claiming that the g-spot DOES exist. This was based on ultrasound scans conducted on a group of 20 women, 9 of which said they experienced vaginal orgasms, while 11 said they did not. The ultrasounds revealed clear anatomical differences between women who said they experienced vaginal orgasms and a group of women who did not. The scans identified a region of thicker tissue where the G spot was rumored to be lurking, which was not visible in the women who had never had a vaginal orgasm. And the conclusion is that some lucky women have a g-spot while others don't. C) The French science geeks who said the g-spot is not a spot but is the clitoral root when it is pulled closely to the anterior vaginal wall Like wat, you say? Well, it English, it means the female clit isn't just those little flaps of skin outside the vagina ready and waiting for a good licking, but the clit extends furthers inside the female vagina, and that suspected 'g-spot' zone is simply the end of the clit (clitoral root, which is suspected to be fully of sensitive nerves). For women who experience vaginal orgasms, their clitoral root is pulled more closely to the front (anterior) of the female's vagina and can be stimulated to orgasmic proportions when something (usually a penis or a finger, at worst a dildo, anything else would be kinda weird) is rubbing against the anterior portion of the vagina. For women who don't experience vaginal orgasms, their clitoral root is shorter and hence not get stimulated by anything rubbing up against their vagina's anterior wall. The French scientists called this the Clitoral Complex and performed their study by taking vaginal sonographs (ultrasounds) of 5 women, who were asked to play with themselves and identify the spot where they felt the most stimulated. The women poked at the areas closest to the clitoral root, hence leading to the aforementioned conclusions. As with all scientific studies, there are weaknesses, and the problem with the study done by the British science geeks is while their sample size was much bigger (1800 women) compared to 20 women studied by the Italian science geek and 5 women studied by the French science geeks, their methodology was seriously flawed. The Italiano and Frenchies carried out ultrasounds on their subjects and something tangible, ie. a thicker wall of skin around the supposed area of the g-spot, could be seen from the ultrasound scans. The Brits, however, conducted purely surveys (and these were filled by the women themselves) which in themselves could have been answered in a purely subjective manner. You never know if the women were too dumb to understand the questions and hence gave the wrong answer, or purposely faked answers for some reason or another. The Brits also did not consider that some women who answered that they don't have a g-spot may actually have not had that area stimulated correctly (ie. they can't find it and their partner does not have the right 'tool' or technique to trigger it) and so they think these women don't have a g-spot when they actually do. SO if the science geeks REALLY wanted to get accurate results, they should have identified the sets of twins consisting of one twin who gets vaginal orgasms and another who doesn't, get them both to screw with the same guy (one who can actually give the vaginal orgasmic twin a nice Big-  and then see if the guy gets BOTH twins to cum. Theoretically, since identical twins are genetically identical, if one can cum through vaginal penetration with a partner who knows what he's doing, then other should be able to cum with the same as well. And even if trends show otherwise (the non-vaginal orgasmic twins still can't cum), then there could be other possible reasons. But certainly I don't think it's very logical to say that the g-spot in twins who do get vaginal orgasms is a pure 'figment of their imagination'. I mean, an orgasm is an orgasm, you know when you're having it and that ecstatic moment of pleasure is certainly NOT a figment of one's imagination! Of course, such a study would be impossible to do. I'm sure as close knit as most identical twins would be, I'm sure sharing the same man in bed would be still be a big no-no, let alone sharing their same-man sexcapades with a bunch of science geeks. That would be too weird even for an episode of the Bold and the Beautiful.Not unexpectedly, the British scientists got quite a bit of flack on their report. The French science geeks apparently were not happy about their findings and blamed it on a totalitarian attitude as a result of them being predominantly Protestant. Not quite sure what that's about but, I guess it's just another good reason for the Brits and French to disagree in addition to whether wine or beer is the better alcohol. Another very interesting article, albeit rather condescending and extremely detailed article supporting the case for the existence of the g-spot is was written by Dr. Susan Block, an American sexologist, sex therapist and expert is all things sex. And yes, she says she has a g-spot and apparently had one in the midst of writing that article, just to check that it hadn't disappeared overnight as a result of the study by the British guys. Hear hear, Dr. Block. So in my humble opinion, the Italian and French guys had their head bolts screwed on tighter and their findings show much more likely that the g-spot is real. It could be a bean shaped area, as some women claim, or an extension of the clitoral root on the anterior vagina like the French guys claim, but whatever it is and whatever you wanna call it, it's real. HOWEVER, this doesn't mean women who don't get vaginal organisms should start feeling inadequate and go g-spot hunting like they're trying to dig for gold down there, coz' it's just as likely that a number of women just don't have a g-spot. It's just an anatomical difference and you're either born with it or not. I personally don't experience vaginal orgasms, so either it's just hasn't been hit correctly yet or I just don't have it. No biggie, my clitoral orgasms keep me perfectly happy and sex-ified. Ok, people, now that I've made you feel a bit more intellectual, I will now have to get to bed, play with my clit and have a wonderful totally clitoral, completely non-vaginal, I-don't-give-a-crap-if-I-have-a-G-spot-or-not orgasm. G-out! gspot.journal.blogspot.c o m  |
|||
|
Don’t give up looking for your g-spot! Happy to lend a hand if you would like some help finding it! PS Can I see a pic of your nice and perky titties now?
| ||
|
BTW - sounds like they need to do ultrasound testing on the identical twins that didn't both report having the same experience. If they are physically identical but don’t share the same experience, then the research can move on to looking at other factors, for example psychological or differences in technique, etc. Whatever the reason, more empirical testing needs to be done on twins…
| ||
12/8/2010 7:37 am |
can i rub it or lick it?
| ||
|
Would be damn impressed if any guy could lick a g-spot. It's kinda waaaayy deep in there somewhere.
| ||
|
Let me find ur g-spot dear....
| ||
|
|
Become a member to create a blog
